Let us use the concept of translatio imperii—transfer of imperium (authority, rule)—as an experiment upon today’s geopolitics.

This idea is an ideological manoeuvre whereby the authority of one regime was said to have transferred to another distinct regime, one that came later and was based elsewhere. So various European elites claimed that their State was the continuation of the Roman Empire: that power transferred from Rome through Constantinople to Moscow, for example, making Moscow a Third Rome. Although Rome was often itself viewed as a translation of Greek or Trojan authority, so the chain could be extended back even further. So we have those eccentric English theorists who believed, or pretended to believe, that power transferred from Babylon through Persia and Greece and Rome to England. This latter example was even decorated by noted murderer Edmund Spenser, with his claim that the Irish are descended from the Scythians, as if the civilised party is always fated to be confronted by the same barbarians, in the fashion of a comic book wherein a hero and villain confront each other without cease in issue after issue.

Now these are pseudohistorical fantasias blatantly intended to buttress the authority of the ones making the claim, but there is one example worth exploring of this phenomenon: the zionist entity (a pseudohistorical fantasia if ever there was one). It has become abundantly clear that the historical model that the zionists are following in their genocide is the one that they know best. With their designs upon every country bordering Palestine, and some even further afield; their reference to the need for livingspace; their writing numbers on their victims’ skin; their talk of camps for Palestinians: the descendants of Hitler’s victims, they nevertheless take the nazi atrocities as their model. Better to say: as Jewish people, they were the victims of the nazis; as zionists, they surrendered their claim on being Jewish and became instead the offspring of the nazis.

There is no secret in the fact that the zionists are historically reliant upon the nazis. Without the nazi terror, no zionist entity would have taken control of Palestine. Just as the present writer has demonstrated at length that the elites of the Irish State have taken on the attitude to the natives of the imperialists whom they replaced, so he will argue that the zionist entity represents the continuity of European nazism, only displaced to Western Asia. Those who are offended by this argument would do well to reflect on how offended millions of Palestinians are by a genocide conducted openly since 1948 in which the oppressors deny themselves no act of injustice or torture.