European nazis used advanced technology to visit slaughter upon their victims, an industrial operation of transport, containment and murder; not only the scale of it appalls, but this quality of modernity. This new generation of nazis occupying Palestine also uses the latest technology, but to kill Palestinians where they are, without the need for a cover-up; the zionazis operate entirely brazenly, knowing that the white elites of Europe—and the weird and tacky white settler regimes on other continents—are conscious collaborators, appeasers, enablers. This generation of nazis revel publicly in the pleasure of genocide, and are inviting the whole white world to share in it. 

As Macdara has previously argued, it is not that zionazis truly control White Opinion—though they are not shy of flaunting their influence—it is that they are the party of power, and the elites (and their imitators) will systematically line up behind the party of power, from those in government through captains of industry to captains of the security apparatus. It is on this basis that Macdara predicts that the zionist entity is less secure than it might imagine itself to be at the moment, while it is in a position in which there is literally nothing that it could do to Palestine or its neighbours that would lose it the support of its backers. One can sense that many in the white countries are passive in their zionism, understanding that they must marginalise Palestinians because zionazis care, but not because they themselves particularly do. This is not ideological adherence, but rather a desire to fit in. Any damage to the zionazis’ appearance of power is liable therefore to shake the fealty of many who currently fall in line. The nazis have lost before; we must hope that they will again. And Trump, we know, does not like losers. 

But now, while they believe themselves to stand astride the globe—they would seize the whole world if they could—we see that the only standards the zionazis have are double standards. No lie is too blatant, no claim too extravagant. They delight in showing the debased nature of their enablers, who must prove their commitment to the cause by adopting ever more absurd positions, say, supporting rape. The compliant media is unwilling to do the work to even get away from the language they are fed: there were no Hezbollah pagers, for example. Recall that when the zionazis referred to Hamas vehicles, they were referring to vehicles used by NGOs, the UN, journalists, and above all, to cars full of terrified Palestinian civilians. The pagers in Lebanon could have been in any hands, held up to any faces, at the time the zionazis attacked: by any measure, this was indiscriminate killing, for which the word is terrorism. Let us not dwell on the willing use of hostages for zionists held in Palestine—who would all have participated in military training, making them legitimate military targets—and prisoners for those held in Occupied Palestine; the very first step in dealing with the zionazis is to disbelieve anything and everything they say, but the Western media cannot do this. Even just reversing every IOF statement and publishing those, would be a fine act of journalism, not to mention an extremely efficient way of filing copy: we did bomb the hospital, we do not care about civilians, et cetera. But no. White journalists only want to click and drag IOF statements directly into their news bulletins.

Since this piece was first drafted, the zionazis have also seized part of Syria, described by a genocide-compliant media as taking a buffer zone, as if this invasion and occupation were some neutral activity, a sensible move, even: more than excusable, sure anyone would do the same!